Ports making positive moves to handle mega-ships | Expert column
“There they blow: Neopanamax ships and ultra large container vessels (ULCVs). Whatever a particular port might call them, they are big. And, they are here, steaming up our coast.
The Panama Canal expansion has opened a new shipping route for these ships from Asia that is particularly favorable to marine terminals in the Southeast – leaving Northeast ports more reliant on the Suez Canal. The Port of Virginia and the Port of Georgia currently rank one and two for services deploying ULCVs through Panama.
The commonwealth and the Port of Virginia have wisely invested $711 million to handle of these behemoths: most of these ships carry more than 13,000 TEUs (20-foot equivalent units).
On May 8, the container ship COSCO Development broke the ice in this new global market by berthing at Virginia International Gateway terminal in Portsmouth.
The first-in call from this ship met with much fanfare and excitement, as it should have. Our competitors in New York/New Jersey, Savannah and Charleston did not get this same honor. First-in calls allow goods shipped to their desired markets to arrive faster, ensuring favorable port designation by manufacturers, shippers and others reliant on ocean carriage and looking for development opportunities.
This ship’s new route begins in Asia, transits the Panama Canal, and heads directly for our port before heading south to Savannah and finally Charleston.
The battle cry for The Port of Virginia in this new economy – “deeper wider safer” – not only emphasizes our need to continuously improve our port’s condition but also signals to customers what differentiates us from our East Coast competitors. The Port of Virginia, with 50-foot channel depths, possesses:
• Congressional approval to dredge to 55 feet
• The highest rail-volume of any port on the East Coast thanks to double stack services provided by Norfolk Southern and CSX
• The immense acreage on Craney Island that offers future cargo handling growth
• Skilled and experienced labor working with the most advanced container handling technology.
All of these benefits entice oceanic common carriers to make our port their first-in call or last-out call, also a favorable designation for goods leaving the United States. Despite these clear advantages, our port leaders do not suffer a myopic view of our global gateway.
VIRGINIA AND GEORGIA PORTS COLLABORATE
In third place behind New York/New Jersey and Savannah container volume, the Port of Virginia is coming on strong.
The Virginia Port Authority and the Georgia Ports Authority entered into the East Coast Gateway Terminal Agreement on Feb. 22 and shortly thereafter submitted an agreement to the federal government for approval, which came April 7.
While the gateway agreement does not address rates, charges, terms or conditions on containers or chassis, it provides a wealth of other shared information. In particular, it will “promote the most efficient use of port assets by permitting the parties to exchange information related to the best use of their wharves, berths and cargo handling equipment.”
It allows the two ports to discuss “how to mitigate costs associated with mega-vessels and retain the velocity of container movement.” The intent is to “foster economic growth and provide public benefit” for the two largest Southeast ports.
This partnership will allow the ports to utilize joint marketing materials in attracting ocean common carriers, to better coordinate vessel calls for Neopanamax ships arriving in the southeast, to develop the most advanced container handling operations, to improve intermodal operations through terminals and to negotiate with a single voice.
The shared information will enable our port to sprint ahead in a global economy where the top 12 ocean common carriers, including COSCO, have developed three powerful market alliances controlling almost all container movement across the seven seas.
When dealing with powerful alliances such as the one between 2M and HMM – which consists of Maersk, Mediterranean Shipping Company and Hyundai Merchant Marine – that control nearly a third of the global container market share, the gateway agreement prevents the tail from wagging the dog right off it legs.
BENEFITS OF GEORGIA PARTNERSHIP
Partnering with the Georgia authority helps us on other commercial fronts too. Most important, it allows the two ports to succeed in winning growing Midwest market opportunities that could level the population advantage enjoyed by New York/New Jersey.
The agreement provides us access to information from five additional marine terminals with slightly more weekly vessel calls. It allows us to share information about off-terminal transportation plans and issues concerning development opportunities beyond terminal gates. Savannah, for instance, has multiple distribution centers for various companies. Knowledge will be key in the Midwest battleground.
Virginia and the Port of Virginia have invested within our port facilities and planned well for this new and uncertain economy. Expanded container handling spaces, new and increased trucking gates at NIT, road and rail improvements within and near the terminals, and advanced container handling equipment are just some of the improvements.
But, we as a state and as a region need to look beyond the terminal gates. The question now becomes: how can our state and our region capitalize on the voluminous intermodal traffic that will flow from our ports?
City and county lines and politics should not be allowed to hold back the rising tide. We must look at the oncoming increase in intermodal traffic not as an overwhelming burden on existing business models and transportation networks but as an opportunity to develop and take the lead in the container rush.
Tom Berkley is a shareholder at Pender & Coward focusing on maritime, admiralty and transportation law. Contact him at email@example.com
or visit www.pendercoward.com.